A Look At The Photo And Video Images From The Vietnam War

A look at the photo and video images from the Vietnam War reveals a confusing picture. On the one hand, there are South Vietnamese soldiers, members of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN), cheerfully working with American troops and often commanded by American ‘advisors.’ In contrast, other South Vietnamese men and women attacked any Americans that they found vulnerable; these were the Vietcong, the freedom army that fought in alliance with North Vietnam for ‘liberation’ of the South from ‘imperialism.’ So, the War in South Vietnam was politically a complex one, with many opposing factors and interests. In consequence, the relationship between the South Vietnamese people and the American population in the country was a complex†¦show more content†¦The Vietnamese people fought a bitter war to free themselves from French imperial rule, and saw the war end with the division of the country into the Communist North and the free South. Later, when American people came to Vietnam in large numbers, the Vietnamese saw rich, technologically advanced white people intruding into their country. They saw another version of the French, another white imperialist, and this contributed to feelings of resentment against the Americans that they encountered. In addition, the average South Vietnamese person had a longing for the reunification of Vietnam, for the joining of North and South. Since the North was fighting for the reunification of the country (under its rule) many South Vietnamese sided with the North, for the sake of reunification. Others sided with the North for the communization of the South. Some sided with the North for both reasons. These people opposed the American presence, and thought to harm any American that they saw, for the simple reason that the policy of America was to prevent both communization and reunification with the North. Those who felt most strongly about reunification or communization, or both , joined the Vietcong, a freedom organization that among other things killed as many Americans --- civilian or military --- that they could. On the other hand, many South Vietnamese feared communist rule, and did not want reunification with the North at the price of being communized and ruled by a

Affect vs.Effect How to Choose the Right Word

The words affect and effect are often confused because they sound alike and have related meanings, although theyre used differently. In most cases, affect is a verb and effect is a noun. How to Use Affect As a verb, affect has several meanings. The first and most common is, to influence, create a change, or alter something or someone. Affect also means to pretend to feel something (to affect sadness). In its original sense in Middle French, affecter meant to have a sad or unfortunate impression on, and when affect stands unmodified, it does typically mean to sadden. In psychology and psychiatry, the term affect (with stress on the first syllable) is also a noun with the technical meaning an expressed or observed emotional response. However, this term seldom appears in nontechnical writing. How to Use Effect Effect, on the other hand, is usually a noun meaning the result or consequence of some action or event. The noun effect also means something thats intended to create a particular impression or feeling, as in the effect of flying. And it can mean to make operative, as in the law will take effect in January 2022, as well as to have an operative influence on, as its used in side effect or aftereffect. In addition, it may function as part of a well-established compound noun such as Doppler effect or greenhouse effect. The main confusion happens when effect is used as a verb, meaning to cause. The difference is the strength of the verbs: to affect change means to have an impact on change, while to effect change means to create it. Examples The following are examples of when you might use the verb affect to mean influence: The heat affected my ability to think clearly.The sportsman was not affected by the crowds booing in the stadium.Adverse publicity affected the outcome of the election.Volcanoes can temporarily affect the quality of the atmosphere. Affect can also mean to put on or assume: Jane affected disdain for Pavel that she did not, in fact, feel.When you attend parties at the White House, you should affect an air of cool sophistication. Use the noun effect to describe an outcome or result: The extreme heat had a devastating effect on my garden.The effects of the Black Death included the reduction of the population of Europe.One side effect of the medication is drowsiness. Use the verb effect to mean to create, make happen or bring about: If you want to effect change in Washington, you have to vote.It is time to effect  a revolution in table manners.It looks to me as if we have effected a tactical surprise. How to Remember the Difference The main difference between the most common uses of affect and effect is the part of speech. As Brian Klems points out in a Writers Digest column, affect is an action, and both words begin with an a; an effect is the end result of an action, and both begin with an e. Sources Affect; effect. The Chicago Manual of Style. 16th ed., University of Chicago Press, 2010, p. 264.Fogarty, Mignon. Affect Versus Effect. Grammar Girls 101 Misused Words Youll Never Confuse Again. New York: St. Martins Griffin, 2011. p. 12.Klems, Brian A. Affect vs. Effect. The Writers Dig, 22 Jan. 2013.

The Impact of Technology in Developing Effective Teamwork...

Developing Effective Teamwork in Organizations: Teamwork is one of the most important elements for the effectiveness of an organization in achieving its goals because people are an essential building block of total quality management within the organization. Actually, the main responsibility of the achievement of quality lies with the individual or group carrying out the organizational activities and processes. The importance of teamwork in an organization is evident in the fact that the complexity of organizational processes requires individuals and groups to tackle the activities efficiently. However, teamwork in an organization is achieved through proper strategies, mechanisms, and structure that are implemented carefully and efficiently. For instance, effective teamwork requires employees to engage in organizational processes with the commitment from senior managers. Nature of Groups and Group Behavior within Organizations: Organizations are usually characterized by different groups who interact in a way that every individual plays a significant role in the achievement of the goals and aims of the organization. Groups are established in an organization for several purposes including helping the organization to achieve important tasks and promoting the maintenance of high-quality workforce through satisfying the needs of the members (McCuddy, 2003, p.4). Notably, these groups are generally divided into two major categories i.e. formal and informal groups that areShow MoreRelatedA New Enterprise Resource Planning System1627 Words   |  7 Pagesregard to the organization as a whole, as opposed to smaller changes within an organization, such as adding a new person or adapting a new program. An example of organizational change might include a change in operation, restructuring operations, teams, layoffs, new technologies, collaborations, rightsizin g, or even new programs. Some specialists submit to organizational alterations. Frequently this phase authorizes an essential and thorough reorientation in the way an organization operates. AccordingRead MoreOrganizational Structures And Organizational Cultures For Different Organizations Essay1277 Words   |  6 PagesExecutive Summary The first task of the report of assignment ‘Organization and Behaviour’ deals with the comparison of various different kinds of organizational structures and organizational cultures for different organizations. In addition, the task takes into account the impact of the culture and the structure of organization on the functions and operation of business. However, the various factors which influence the individual performance and behaviour at work is also given emphasis in this partRead MoreIntegrating Virtual Teams And The Development Of Employee Expectations1398 Words   |  6 Pagesthe increasing progression of modern technology, and the paramount development of employee expectations, society has seen great shifts in globalization. Organizations have created new and innovative ways to teamwork, and many of today’s organizations have transformed their views from traditional teamwork, to a new phenomenon in that of virtual teams (Daft, 2012). Due to globalization , organizations have become cross functional, and utilizes modern technology such as e-mail, instant messaging, video-conferencingRead MoreThe Leader in Me1370 Words   |  6 Pagesprofessional colleagues. From that feedback he reviews these findings as they relate to his relationships and career choices. Additionally the subject of the assessments completed correlates his findings that contribute to the success in the organization in developing one’s own personal skills and the relationship of leading employees. The author’s self assessment findings are summarized and the assessment results are illustrated in the essay appendices. Leadership Capabilities and Organizational Behavior Read MoreUnderstand the Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Culture.1779 Words   |  8 Pagesactivities 3 Understand ways of using motivational theories in organisations Motivation theories, motivation and performance, leadership, Leadership and successful change in organizations 4 Understand mechanisms for developing effective teamwork in organisations Teams and team building, team dynamics, Impact of technology on team functioning: 1|Page BTEC HND in Business/ Organisation and Behaviour/Sept12 -BLANK PAGE- 2|Page BTEC HND in Business/ Organisation and Behaviour/Sept12 UNIT INTRODUCTIONRead MoreDefining Next-Generation Products an Inside Look1218 Words   |  5 PagesArticle Overview: The persistent success of technology based companies depends on their proficiency in creating next generation products and their derivatives. They found that most of the companies were unable to complete such projects on schedule. The companies also had difficulty developing the derivative products needed to fill the gaps in the market that their next-generation products would create. The root cause problem was in the product definition phase and not spontaneously; all the successfulRead MoreThe Organizational Behavior Of Kellogg3547 Words   |  15 Pagesstructure and culture of the organization. The third part includes how kellogg uses motivational theories within its workplace. The fourth part of the assignment describes about the method of developing teamwork within the organization. Table of the Contents Lists of the Contents Page No Introduction 4 Part-1: Management and leadership styles of Kellogg 4 1.1: The effectiveness of different leadership styles in different organizations 4 1.2: How the organizationalRead MoreFlorida Hospital : A Global Health Care Leader1634 Words   |  7 PagesHospital is one of the largest non-profit organizations; founded in 1908, it now has 24 campuses throughout the state of Florida. It has become one of the most well known hospitals across the world for its compassionate services. The mission statement is â€Å"Extending the healing ministry of Christ†. The organization’s values are remembered by the acronym ICBEST; integrity, compassion, balance, excellence, stewardship and teamwork (History and Organization, n.d). Florida Hospital Celebration HealthRead MoreEvaluation Of The Joint Commission On The Accreditation Of Hospitals1324 Words   |  6 PagesQSEN Essay Paper Teamwork and Collaboration Natalie M. Alvarez Intro to Prof. Nursing NUR3160 Professor Newman November 26, 2014 â€Æ' Introduction According to the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAHO) in July 2004 released a Sentinel Event Alert on the prevention of infant deaths. Its database showed that nearly three-quarters of hospitals cited communication break down and teamwork problems as a major reason for these deaths. The practice of teamwork and collaborationRead Morebusiness Assignment1024 Words   |  5 Pagesand leadership Outcome 3: Understand ways of using motivational theories in organisations Outcome 4: Understand mechanisms for developing effective teamwork in organisations SCENARIO According to Bergstram and Hamilton, organisations have different structures and these structures have a bearing on attitudes and behaviour. Each organization has a different culture and structure which makes them a different performer altogether. Behaviour of individuals working in these organisations

Federalism in America and India free essay sample

Thereby both countries had attained dominion status in which a number of smaller states had got affiliated forming a union with a strong central government that came to be called as Federal Government in the US and Central Government in India. Thus both states became Federal Republics. While framing the Indian constitution, its drafting committee headed by Dr. Ambedkar, had borrowed many salient features from various constitutions in the world including US but adopted them in the Indian context. Hence, both U. S and India, despite being federal in structure have many similarities and differences between them. Similarities between US and India:- 1) Written constitution:- Both US and India have a written constitution based on which the federal political structure has been set up and both federal governments are functioning. Both constitutions have provisions for amending the constitution to meet the growing socio, political and economic needs and demands of their respective countries. 2) Bill of Rights and Fundamental Rights:- The US constitution has ensured the fundamental rights of its citizens like right to equality, freedom, right against exploitation, freedom of religion, cultural and educational rights, right to property, and right to constitutional remedies etc through ‘The Bill of Rights’,. They became part and parcel of the US constitution through first ten amendments that were carried out and adopted into the US constitution. The Indian constitution has guaranteed the fundamental rights of the people through articles 14 to 34 in Part III. ) Supremacy of the Federal or Union Government:- Both countries have federal governments at the centre in which various states have acceeded to. In the US as many as 50 states have joined the federal government and in the Indian Union as many as 29 states and 8 Union territories have acceeded to. Both in US and India, states which have acceeded to the Federal set up have no unilateral power to secede from the Federal Government or the Union Governme nt. While Federal Government or the Union Government as well as the states are empowered to enact laws on a particular subject,(known as concurrent powers),the law enacted by the Federal or Union Government will have overriding effect over the law enacted by the states on the same subject. Thus Federal or Union Government is supreme in the present federal structure. 4) Division of Labor and Separation of Powers:- Adhering to Montesquieus theory of division of labor and separation of powers, both US and Indian constitutions have three basic divisions with regard to division of labor and power in their federal set up known as executive, legislature and judiciary with clear cut ‘Separation of Powers’ Each division has been entrusted with a separate power. The executive governs the country, the legislature enacts laws and the judiciary administers justice. President of US is the chief executive head of US, whereas the Union cabinet headed by the Prime Minister is the real chief executive body in India. Both US and India have a bicameral legislature. US legislature has an upper and lower house known as the House of Senate and the House of Representatives respectively and the Indian Parliament has Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha as its Lower and Upper house respectively. Both US and India have a well organized judiciary, having the Supreme Court or the Federal Court as the apex court and a number of other courts in various states to administer original and appellate jurisdictions. 5)Powers of Checks and Balances:- Though there exists a clear cut division of labor known as separation of powers into executive, legislature and judiciary in both countries, still there is a threat. to democracy. A strong and dynamic leadership at the helm of powers as the executive and acting with unlimited powers may lead to arbitrariness. After all power corrupts power; absolute power corrupts absolutely; in the result democracy may become a laughing stock and virtually unworkable. Hence, in order to prevent unwieldy growth of any one of these three divisions, a fantastic mechanism known as powers of ‘checks and balances’ has been maintained in both countries. In other words, each division of power is somehow or other checked and controlled by other divisions of power. In the US, the President as the chief executive power appoints his members of ‘Kitchen Cabinet’ and he is the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of Army,Navy and the Air Force. He appoints the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the US. He enters into treaties with other countries. However, his treaties must be approved by the House of Senate. Otherwise, the treaty will not come into force. Though President Woodrow Wilson was the chief architect of the League of Nations that came into being after the first world war,US could not become a member of it since the House of Senate did not approve it. Thus important policy decisions must be necessarily approved by the House of Senate, which definitely acts as a check on the powers of US President, who is the head of the executive. Similarly laws enacted by both houses may be subjected to the power of Judicial Review and can be declared null and void by the judiciary. The President can be impeached and removed from power on the motion moved by the House of Senate in the presence of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the US. Similarly in India, the Prime Minister and his cabinet can be removed from power by a successful no confidence motion passed by both houses of parliament. The important policy decisions taken by the cabinet headed by the Prime Minister, if necessary has to be enacted into laws only with the requisite majority of the parliament. The laws enacted by the parliament. re subject to the judicial review of the Supreme Cour of India. The Chief Justice and other Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President as recommended by the cabinet and the Prime Minister. Thus the powers of checks and balances have been the effective mechanism both in the US and in India in safeguarding the democracy in both countries. Differences between the federalisms of US and India:- The differences that exist between the federalisms of US and India are unique. These differences have been wantonly created by the architects of the Indian constitution. The US federalism is very strong and more rigid as envisaged in their constitution by its leaders. It is more federal than unitary. in character. Whereas, India is more unitary than federal and we can even say that it is a quasi-federal state. 1) The Constitution of US is very rigid than the Indian Constitution:- i)The constitution of US is very brief and rigid running into only a few pages, whereas the constitution of India is very voluminous containing as many as XXII parts, 395 articles and ten schedules. Since the US constitution is very rigid, the provisions meant for amending the constitution are also very rigid and more formal. The last amendment carried out in the US constitution was in the year 1992. Between the period 1989 and 1992, the US constitution has been amended only 27 times, in which the 21 st amendment was to reverse the 18 th amendment Whereas, the Indian constitution which came into force in the year 1950, has so far been amended 94 times. Therefore, it is easy to amend the Indian constitution, since it involves four different types of procedures which are comparatively easy than the amending procedure of the US constitution. For example, recently, the salaries and allowances of the Indian MPs have been hiked through a voice vote of the members of the Indian Parliament, whereas in the US, the 27 th amendment originally proposed on 25th September, 1789, was ratified on May 7 th, 1992, regulating the provision for varying the compensation of the members of the House of Senate and Representatives. i) In the US, though there is a Federal Constitution, all the states affiliated with the Federal Government,owing their allegiance to the Federal Constitution, have their own constitutions to regulate their own governance. In India, all the states affiliated with the Indian Union owe their allegiance only to the Indian constitution and do not have their own constitution; however, each state is empowered to enact its own laws inc luded in the state as well as in the concurrent list of the constitution. ) While US has the Presidential form of Government, India has the Parliamentary form of Government:- In the US, the President is the head of the state and so his government is invariably mentioned as the Presidential form of government or democracy; In India, the President is only a nominal head or titular sovereign power;( dejure sovereign),whereas the Prime Minister and his cabinet is the defacto or popular sovereign in whom the real power exists. In the US, the President is popularly elected ,besides chosen through an electoral college. However, nominating a candidate for ontesting the Presidential election by a political party in the US is a cumbersome process. This process is comparatively simpler than the Indian system of forming the cabinet and electing the Prime Minister from a party which enjoys a majority of elected members of the Lok Sabha. While the US follows the bi-party system, India has a multi -party system and a complicated process of election. While the US President holds power for a period of 4 years,while the Indian Prime Minister holds power for five years as long as his political party enjoys majority in the Lok Sabha. However, the US President irrespective of his affiliation with a political party, Republican or Democrat and irrespective of his party’s success or failure in the elections for the House of Representatives or the House of Senate, holds power for his full tenure. A person in the US can hold the post of President only for two terms, whereas, in India there is no such restriction to hold the post of a Prime Minister or President. For example, Nehru was the Prime Minister of India between 1947 and 1964 for a period of 17 years. The Indian cabinet and the Prime Minister are collectively and directly responsible and answerable to the parliament and indirectly to the people, whereas, the US President has constitutional obligations and duties and of course answerable to the people. For the dereliction of duty and blunder committed by a cabinet minister in India, the Prime Minister and his entire cabinet colleagues are liable,responsible and answerable, because they have collective responsibilities. 3) Differences between the legislatures of US and India:- In India, the lower house or the Lok Sabha is more powerful and its members are directly elected by the people and the members of the Upper house or Rajya Sabha are indirectly elected every two years. The Lok Sabha members represent their constituencies on the basis of their population strength; In the US, the House of Representatives are elected on the basis of the population strength of a state, but irrespective of the size of the state or its population, each state in the US has only two senate members, totaling 100 members in all in the US. While the Lok Sabha or the lower house is more powerful in India, the House of Senate or the upper house is more powerful in the US. While a Senate member in the US is directly elected, a Rajya Sabha member in India is indirectly elected by a system of proportional and transferable voting system. 4) Differences in the judicial system between US and India:- While the US has an advanced judicial system, India has a rapidly developing judicial system. An accused or a witness in the US can depose from the place where he is imprisoned, thereby avoiding unnecessary travel all the way from Chicago or Los Angels to New York using the advanced technology. Such facilities are yet to develop in India. While a Judge in the US can hold his post for life as long as he enjoys his good health, in India it is slightly different. A District judge unless elevated retires at the age of 58, a High Court and a Supreme court Judge retires at the age of 65. Thus both the US and the Indian Federalism despite having limitations are by and large successful.